The Kepler Problem
- Classical Mechanics 2.4

Inverse-Square Force

The Kepler problem is the central force problem with

\[ f(r)=-\frac{k}{r^2}, \qquad V(r)=-\frac{k}{r}, \]

where $k>0$. For gravitation,

\[ k=Gm_1m_2, \]

and the mass in the one-body problem is the reduced mass

\[ \mu=\frac{m_1m_2}{m_1+m_2}. \]

Binet’s equation is

\[ \odvn{2}{u}{\theta}+u = -\frac{\mu}{\ell^2u^2}f\left(\frac{1}{u}\right). \]

Since

\[ f\left(\frac{1}{u}\right)=-ku^2, \]

we obtain

\[ \odvn{2}{u}{\theta}+u=\frac{\mu k}{\ell^2}. \]

The solution is

\[ u=\frac{\mu k}{\ell^2}\left[1+e\cos(\theta-\theta_0)\right]. \]

Thus

\[ r=\frac{p}{1+e\cos(\theta-\theta_0)}, \qquad p=\frac{\ell^2}{\mu k}. \]

This is the polar equation of a conic section with one focus at the force center.

Energy and Eccentricity

The eccentricity is determined by the energy and angular momentum. Using

\[ E = \frac{\ell^2}{2\mu}\left[ \left(\odv{u}{\theta}\right)^2+u^2 \right]-ku, \]

and substituting the conic solution gives

\[ e^2=1+\frac{2E\ell^2}{\mu k^2}. \]

Therefore,

energy eccentricity orbit
$E<0$ $0\le e<1$ ellipse
$E=0$ $e=1$ parabola
$E>0$ $e>1$ hyperbola

The circular orbit is the special case $e=0$. Then

\[ E=-\frac{\mu k^2}{2\ell^2}. \]

This agrees with the circular orbit condition

\[ r_0=\frac{\ell^2}{\mu k}. \]

Elliptic Orbits

For an elliptic orbit, let $a$ be the semimajor axis. The turning points occur when $\dot{r}=0$, so they are the roots of

\[ E = \frac{\ell^2}{2\mu r^2}-\frac{k}{r}. \]

The sum of the two apsidal distances is $2a$, and this gives

\[ a=-\frac{k}{2E}. \]

Thus, for a Kepler ellipse, the energy depends only on the semimajor axis:

\[ E=-\frac{k}{2a}. \]

The angular momentum is related to $a$ and $e$ by

\[ \ell^2=\mu ka(1-e^2). \]

Hence the orbit may also be written as

\[ r=\frac{a(1-e^2)}{1+e\cos(\theta-\theta_0)}. \]

The nearest and farthest distances are

\[ r_{\min}=a(1-e), \qquad r_{\max}=a(1+e). \]

The inverse-square force is therefore special not only because the orbit is closed, but also because the size of an ellipse is fixed by $E$ alone while its shape is fixed by $\ell$ through $e$.

Motion in Time

The orbit equation gives $r$ as a function of $\theta$. To determine the position at a given time, we must use the areal velocity:

\[ \odv{A}{t}=\frac{\ell}{2\mu}. \]

For elliptic motion, introduce the eccentric anomaly $\psi$ by

\[ r=a(1-e\cos\psi). \]

The Cartesian parametrization of the ellipse, with the origin at the focus and periapsis on the positive $x$-axis, is

\[ x=a(\cos\psi-e), \qquad y=a\sqrt{1-e^2}\sin\psi. \]

The period follows from the fact that the areal velocity is constant. The area of the ellipse is

\[ \pi ab =\pi a^2\sqrt{1-e^2}. \]

Since

\[ \ell^2=\mu ka(1-e^2), \]

we get

\[ \tau =2\pi\sqrt{\frac{\mu a^3}{k}}. \]

Equivalently,

\[ \tau^2=\frac{4\pi^2\mu}{k}a^3. \]

For the gravitational two-body problem, $k=Gm_1m_2$ and $\mu=m_1m_2/(m_1+m_2)$, so

\[ \tau^2=\frac{4\pi^2}{G(m_1+m_2)}a^3. \]

If one mass is much larger than the other, this reduces to the usual form of Kepler’s third law.

Let

\[ \omega=\frac{2\pi}{\tau} =\sqrt{\frac{k}{\mu a^3}}. \]

Integrating the time equation gives Kepler’s equation:

\[ \omega(t-t_p)=\psi-e\sin\psi, \]

where $t_p$ is the time of periapsis passage. The left side is the mean anomaly, $\psi$ is the eccentric anomaly, and the polar angle $\theta$ is the true anomaly. The relation between $\theta$ and $\psi$ is

\[ \cos\theta =\frac{\cos\psi-e}{1-e\cos\psi}, \]

or equivalently,

\[ \tan\frac{\theta}{2} =\sqrt{\frac{1+e}{1-e}}\tan\frac{\psi}{2}. \]

Thus the practical time problem is reduced to solving the transcendental equation

\[ \psi-e\sin\psi=M, \]

where $M=\omega(t-t_p)$. This equation has no elementary inverse in general, so numerical methods are required for high-precision orbital prediction.

For parabolic motion, $e=1$, and the orbit can be parametrized by

\[ x=\tan\frac{\theta}{2}. \]

The time from periapsis is then proportional to

\[ x+\frac{x^3}{3}. \]

Thus the parabolic case is algebraic rather than transcendental, but inversion still requires solving a cubic equation.

Laplace-Runge-Lenz Vector

The Kepler problem has one more simple conserved vector. Let

\[ \b{p}=\mu\dot{\b{r}}, \qquad \b{L}=\b{r}\times\b{p}. \]

For the inverse-square force, define

\[ \b{A}=\b{p}\times\b{L}-\mu k\hat{\b{r}}. \]

which is called the Laplace-Runge-Lenz(LRL) vector. We show that $\b{A}$ is conserved. Newton’s equation is

\[ \dot{\b{p}}=-\frac{k}{r^2}\hat{\b{r}}. \]

Since $\b{L}$ is conserved,

\[ \odv{}{t}(\b{p}\times\b{L}) =\dot{\b{p}}\times\b{L}. \]

Using $\b{L}=\b{r}\times\b{p}$ and the triple product identity,

\[ \begin{align*} \dot{\b{p}}\times\b{L} &= -\frac{k}{r^3}\b{r}\times(\b{r}\times\b{p}) \nl &= -\frac{k}{r^3}\left[\b{r}(\b{r}\cdot\b{p})-r^2\b{p}\right] \nl &= \mu k\odv{}{t}\left(\frac{\b{r}}{r}\right). \end{align*} \]

Therefore

\[ \odv{\b{A}}{t}=0. \]

The vector $\b{A}$ is perpendicular to $\b{L}$:

\[ \b{A}\cdot\b{L}=0. \]

Hence it lies in the orbital plane. Taking the dot product with $\b{r}$ gives

\[ \begin{align*} \b{A}\cdot\b{r} &= \b{r}\cdot(\b{p}\times\b{L})-\mu kr \nl &= \b{L}\cdot(\b{r}\times\b{p})-\mu kr \nl &= \ell^2-\mu kr. \end{align*} \]

If $\theta$ is measured from the direction of $\b{A}$, then

\[ Ar\cos\theta=\ell^2-\mu kr. \]

Thus

\[ r=\frac{\ell^2/(\mu k)}{1+\dps \frac{A}{\mu k}\cos\theta}. \]

Comparing with the conic equation, we identify

\[ e=\frac{A}{\mu k}. \]

Therefore $\b{A}$ points toward periapsis and its magnitude determines the eccentricity.

The constants are not independent. One relation is

\[ \b{A}\cdot\b{L}=0. \]

The other is obtained from the magnitude:

\[ A^2=\mu^2k^2+2\mu E\ell^2. \]

This is equivalent to the eccentricity formula.

Degeneracy

For a general central force, $E$ and $\b{L}$ are the natural conserved quantities. They determine the radial bounds and the plane of motion, but they do not usually determine a closed curve. The radial and angular motions generally have incommensurable periods, so the orbit does not close.

The Kepler problem is exceptional. The Laplace-Runge-Lenz vector fixes the direction of the apsidal line and supplies an additional algebraic constant of motion. This is the mechanical origin of the degeneracy of Kepler orbits: the radial period and angular period match so that every bounded orbit is closed.

The harmonic oscillator has a similar closed-orbit property, but its extra conserved quantity is better expressed as a second-rank tensor. These two cases are precisely the two possibilities singled out by Bertrand’s theorem.